Skip to main content

Perry v. State

Citations

  • 794 S.W.2d 141
  • 303 Ark. 100
  • 1990 Ark. LEXIS 388

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • regarding territorial jurisdiction for peace officers, wherein the court reaffirmed the rule, previously stated in City of Argenta v. Keath, 130 Ark. 334 , 340 , 197 S.W. 686 (1917
  • discussing the instances in which local police officers can act outside their territorial jurisdiction
  • where the supreme court recognized the statutory principle in § 16-81-106(d), but concluded Perry had been arrested on a misdemeanor, making the arrest invalid
  • where this court recognized the statutory principle in § 16-81-106(d), but concluded Perry had been arrested on a misdemeanor, making the arrest invalid
  • “[a] local peace officer acting without a warrant outside the territorial limits of the jurisdiction under which he holds office is without official power to apprehend an offender, unless he is authorized to do so by state statute”
  • “A local peace officer acting without a warrant outside the territorial limits of the jurisdiction under which he holds office is without official power to apprehend an offender, unless he is authorized to do so by state statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dudley, Hays, Glaze

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.