McElyea v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[f]or purposes of the robbery statute, it is immaterial whether appellant ever intended to use physical force”
• holding that “[f]or purposes of the robbery statute, it is immaterial whether appellant ever intended to use physical force”
• noting that “[f]or purposes of the robbery statute, it is immaterial whether appellant ever intended to use physical force against -5- [another] to further his escape”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• McElyea v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2005-01-06· cited 9×
• United States v. Tyren Cervenak
  Sixth Circuit· 2025-04-02· cited 6×
• United States v. Edrick Ellis
  Eighth Circuit· 2025-02-07· cited 1×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Smith v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2003-02-20· cited 75×
• Barrett v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2003-09-25· cited 67×
• Cummings v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2003-06-12· cited 51×
• Proctor v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2002-07-05· cited 41×
• Perry v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1990-07-16· cited 39×
• Turner v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2002-07-05· cited 18×
• Saulsberry v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2003-04-16· cited 11×
• Clements v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2002-12-11· cited 7×
• Payne v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2004-04-21· cited 5×
• Wilkens v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1977-03-07· cited 4×
• Garner v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2003-06-18· cited 3×
• Akins v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1972-10-16· cited 3×