N.D. California· 8/4/2010
Perry v. Schwarzenegger
Citations
- 704 F. Supp. 2d 921
- 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78817
- 2010 WL 3025614
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that “by every available metric, opposite-sex couples are not better than their same-sex counterparts; instead, as partners, parents and citizens, opposite-sex couples and same-sex couples are equal”
- finding that “by every available metric, opposite-sex couples are not better than their same-sex counterparts, instead, as partners, parents and citizens, opposite-sex couples and same-sex couples are equal.”
- holding unconstitutional California’s voter-enacted amendment to the California Constitution providing that marriage between only a man and a woman was valid or recognized in the state
- holding sexual orientation is fundamental to a person’s identity
- “Permitting same-sex couples to marry will not affect the number of opposite-sex couples who marry, divorce, cohabit, have children outside of marriage or otherwise affect the stability of opposite-sex marriages.”
- “No credible evidence supports a finding that an individual may, through conscious decision, therapeutic intervention or any other method, change his or her sexual orientation.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Walker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
52 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hollingsworth v. PerrySupreme Court· 2013-06-26· cited 967×
- Obergefell v. HodgesSupreme Court· 2015-06-26· cited 955×
- United States v. WindsorSupreme Court· 2013-06-26· cited 647×
- Smithkline Beecham Corporation v. Abbott LaboratoriesNinth Circuit· 2014-01-21· cited 71×
- protectmarriage.com - Yes on 8 v. Debra BowenNinth Circuit· 2014-05-20· cited 60×
- De Leon v. PerryW.D. Texas· 2014-02-26· cited 60×
- Perry v. BrownNinth Circuit· 2012-02-07· cited 56×
- Perry v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court· 2011-11-17· cited 43×
- Kitchen v. HerbertD. Utah· 2013-12-20· cited 42×
- Bishop v. United States ex rel. HolderN.D. Oklahoma· 2014-01-14· cited 42×
- Whitewood v. WolfM.D. Pennsylvania· 2014-05-20· cited 41×
- In Re Marriage of JB and HBTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2010-12-08· cited 36×
- Latta v. OtterD. Idaho· 2014-05-13· cited 36×
- Deboer v. SnyderE.D. Michigan· 2014-03-21· cited 36×
- Wolf v. WalkerW.D. Wisconsin· 2014-06-06· cited 34×
- Obergefell v. WymysloS.D. Ohio· 2013-12-23· cited 33×
- Geiger v. KitzhaberD. Oregon· 2014-05-19· cited 30×
- Kristin Perry v. Dennis HollingsworthNinth Circuit· 2021-11-18· cited 27×
- Golinski v. United States Office of Personnel ManagementN.D. California· 2012-02-22· cited 27×
- Bourke v. BeshearW.D. Kentucky· 2014-02-12· cited 23×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.