California Supreme Court· 11/17/2011

Perry v. Brown

Citations

52 Cal. 4th 1116
265 P.3d 1002
134 Cal. Rptr. 3d 499
2011 Cal. LEXIS 11683

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that official proponents of California’s Proposition 8 lacked Article III standing in federal court
holding that “the official proponents of an initiative measure are recognized as having a distinct role — involving both authority and responsibilities that differ from other supporters of the measure”
holding that official proponents of California’s Proposition 8 lacked federal constitutional standing
noting that legislators would not be afforded the ability to intervene on behalf of a law that they had sponsored, before holding that official proponents could so intervene
noting that legislators would not be afforded the ability to intervene on behalf of a law that they had sponsored, before holding that official proponents could so intervene
petitioners do not \possess any official authority ... to directly enforce the initiative measure in question\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cantil-Sakauye, Kennard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

56 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.