D. Utah· 12/20/2013
Kitchen v. Herbert
Citations
- 961 F. Supp. 2d 1181
- 2013 WL 6697874
- 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 179331
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the state’s constitutional and statutory ban on same-sex marriage violated the Equal Protection and Due Process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
- reaching same conclusion in challenge to Utah’s marriage definition in case issued after Windsor
- “The Windsor court did not resolve this conflict in the context of state-law prohibitions of same-sex marriage.”
- “[T]he court notes that its decision does not mandate any change for religious institutions, which may continue to express their own moral viewpoints and define their own traditions about marriage.”
- “[T]he court notes that its decision does not mandate any change for religious institutions, which may continue to express their own moral viewpoints and define their own traditions about marriage.”
- “[Sjeveral doctrinal developments ... demonstrate that the Court's summary dismissal in Baker has little if any precedential effect today.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shelby
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Obergefell v. HodgesSupreme Court· 2015-06-26· cited 955×
- Bostic v. SchaeferFourth Circuit· 2014-07-28· cited 192×
- Kitchen v. HerbertTenth Circuit· 2014-06-25· cited 137×
- Bishop v. SmithTenth Circuit· 2014-07-18· cited 114×
- protectmarriage.com - Yes on 8 v. Debra BowenNinth Circuit· 2014-05-20· cited 60×
- De Leon v. PerryW.D. Texas· 2014-02-26· cited 60×
- Bishop v. United States ex rel. HolderN.D. Oklahoma· 2014-01-14· cited 42×
- Whitewood v. WolfM.D. Pennsylvania· 2014-05-20· cited 41×
- Latta v. OtterD. Idaho· 2014-05-13· cited 36×
- Deboer v. SnyderE.D. Michigan· 2014-03-21· cited 36×
- Wolf v. WalkerW.D. Wisconsin· 2014-06-06· cited 34×
- Obergefell v. WymysloS.D. Ohio· 2013-12-23· cited 33×
- Baskin v. BoganS.D. Indiana· 2014-06-25· cited 30×
- Geiger v. KitzhaberD. Oregon· 2014-05-19· cited 30×
- Brenner v. ScottN.D. Florida· 2014-08-21· cited 24×
- Love v. BeshearW.D. Kentucky· 2014-07-01· cited 23×
- Bourke v. BeshearW.D. Kentucky· 2014-02-12· cited 23×
- Henry v. HimesS.D. Ohio· 2014-04-14· cited 21×
- Robicheaux v. CaldwellE.D. Louisiana· 2014-09-03· cited 20×
- Tanco v. HaslamM.D. Tennessee· 2014-03-14· cited 18×
Cites
58 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court· 1985-07-01· cited 7,112×
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court· 1987-06-01· cited 6,491×
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 4,329×
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1968-05-20· cited 3,740×
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court· 1973-04-23· cited 3,699×
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court· 1923-06-04· cited 3,363×
- Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court· 1997-06-26· cited 2,664×
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court· 1992-06-29· cited 2,492×
- West Virginia State Board of Education v. BarnetteSupreme Court· 1943-06-14· cited 2,477×
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court· 1993-06-24· cited 2,199×
- Craig v. BorenSupreme Court· 1976-12-20· cited 2,156×
- Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 2,147×
- Reno v. FloresSupreme Court· 1993-03-23· cited 2,046×
- McDonald v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court· 2010-06-28· cited 2,024×
- Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court· 1975-01-14· cited 2,006×
- Skinner v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court· 1942-06-01· cited 1,929×
- Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court· 1972-03-22· cited 1,851×
- Frontiero v. RichardsonSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 1,487×
- Lawrence v. TexasSupreme Court· 2003-06-26· cited 1,452×
- Romer v. EvansSupreme Court· 1996-06-03· cited 1,427×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.