Royall v. National Ass'n of Letter Carriers, AFL-CIO

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that sworn depositions and documentary evidence sufficed- to meet the employer’s burden to produce a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for its conduct
• holding that sworn depositions and documentary evidence sufficed to meet the employer’s burden to produce a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for its conduct
• concluding that plaintiff had failed to show that “all of the relevant aspects of [his] employment were nearly identical to those of [his comparator]” (quoting Neuren v. Adduci, Mastriani, Meeks & Schill, 43 F.3d 1507, 1514 (D.C. Cir. 1995
• noting that the burden-shifting framework established in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973) applies in employment discrimination cases
• noting that the burden-shifting framework established in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973), applies in employment discrimination cases
• concluding that claimant failed to show that “all of the relevant aspects of [his] employment were nearly identical to those of” an employee of a different race (quoting Neuren v. Adduci, Mastriani, Meeks & Schill, 43 F.3d 1507, 1514 (D.C. Cir. 1995

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).