Perry v. Clinton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting Plaintiff’s contention that purported use of the wrong standard was probative of animus in the absence of any evidence of intentional wrongdoing
• prohibiting plaintiff from “adding clearly unexhausted retaliation claims to her complaint in this Court”
• “An RFC is not a medical determination but an administrative 17 finding or legal decision reserved to the Commissioner based on consideration of all the relevant 18 evidence, including medical evidence, lay witnesses and subjective symptoms.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).