Pernick v. Computershare Trust Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that unjust enrichment claim was precluded by a contract because plaintiff never asserted that any aspect of the contract was unenforceable
• granting motion to dismiss breach of contract claim asserted under Colorado law for failure to state a claim
• finding no fraud in which party “had access to the very information that would have led to the conclusion” that the other party had made a false representation
• finding no fraud in which party “had access to the very information that would have led to the conclusion” that the other party had made a false representation
• “Plaintiff fails to identify contractual provisions suggesting [Defendant’s alleged obligation] and, as a result, fails to state a claim for breach of contract.”
• “Although the securities industry may, in a general sense, be heavily regulated, the specific service that Computershare provides is not a practical necessity to members of the public[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Re/Max, LLC v. Quicken Loans Inc.
  D. Colorado· 2018-03-20· cited 152×
• Weinman v. Crowley (In re Blair)
  D. Colorado· 2018-11-09· cited 3×

Cites

57 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Ashcroft v. Iqbal
  Supreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
• Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly
  Supreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
• Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-04· cited 1,661×
• Khalik v. United Air Lines
  Tenth Circuit· 2012-02-06· cited 1,594×
• Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 1,291×
• Gff Corporation, an Oklahoma Corporation v. Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc., a Missouri Corporation
  Tenth Circuit· 1997-11-25· cited 980×
• Bryson v. Gonzales
  Tenth Circuit· 2008-07-28· cited 909×
• Tal v. Hogan
  Tenth Circuit· 2006-06-29· cited 788×
• Town of Alma v. AZCO Construction, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2000-09-18· cited 726×
• CTS Corp. v. Dynamics Corp. of America
  Supreme Court· 1987-04-21· cited 476×
• United States v. Marvin P. Jones
  Eleventh Circuit· 1994-08-30· cited 410×
• Bixler v. Foster
  Tenth Circuit· 2010-02-22· cited 407×
• Koch v. Koch Industries, Inc.
  Tenth Circuit· 2000-02-14· cited 395×
• Tunkl v. Regents of University of California
  California Supreme Court· 1963-07-09· cited 391×
• Hamon Contractors, Inc. v. Carter & Burgess, Inc.
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2009-08-14· cited 236×
• Kramer v. Western Pacific Industries, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1988-08-22· cited 231×
• Trierweiler v. Croxton & Trench Holding Corp.
  Tenth Circuit· 1996-09-06· cited 230×
• Jones v. Dressel
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1981-02-23· cited 226×
• Redden v. SCI Colorado Funeral Services, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2002-01-14· cited 222×
• Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Alcan Aluminium Ltd.
  Supreme Court· 1990-01-10· cited 172×