C.D. Illinois· 1/16/2003
DeJohn v. The. TV Corp. Intern.
Citations
- 245 F. Supp. 2d 913
- 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2256
- 2003 WL 356181
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that implied contract claims were precluded where an enforceable express contract, an online agreement, governed the parties’ relationship
- explaining that “failure to read a contract is not a get out of jail free card,” and that the “same rule applies to electronic contracts”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Manning
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Feldman v. Google, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 2007-03-29· cited 97×
- Rogers v. Dell Computer Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 2005-06-28· cited 91×
- Rogers v. Dell Computer Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 2005-11-29· cited 66×
- CoStar Realty Information, Inc. v. FieldD. Maryland· 2009-03-31· cited 45×
- United States v. DrewC.D. California· 2009-08-28· cited 34×
- Nucap Industries, Inc. v. Robert Bosch LLCN.D. Illinois· 2017-03-31· cited 27×
- Adsit Co., Inc. v. GustinIndiana Court of Appeals· 2007-10-16· cited 19×
- Siebert v. Amateur Athletic Union of United States, Inc.D. Minnesota· 2006-03-14· cited 15×
- Davidson & Associates, Inc. v. Internet GatewayE.D. Missouri· 2004-09-30· cited 12×
- Harris v. comScore, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 2011-10-07· cited 12×
- A v. v. Iparadigms, Ltd. Liability Co.E.D. Virginia· 2008-03-11· cited 11×
- Ranazzi v. Amazon.com, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-10-23· cited 7×
- Chen v. Mayflower Transit, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 2004-03-12· cited 6×
- Gambo v. Lyft, Inc.District of Columbia· 2022-11-16
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court· 1941-06-02· cited 8,668×
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court· 1984-05-22· cited 5,292×
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 3,455×
- Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. ShuteSupreme Court· 1991-04-17· cited 1,405×
- Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company and Nu-Car Carriers, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1984-10-30· cited 1,241×
- United States v. BestfoodsSupreme Court· 1998-06-08· cited 1,059×
- Carter v. StantonSupreme Court· 1972-04-03· cited 382×
- Roby v. Corp. of Lloyd'sSecond Circuit· 1993-06-02· cited 302×
- 188 LLC v. Trinity Industries, IncorporatedSeventh Circuit· 2002-08-01· cited 273×
- William Scott and Rosemary Scott v. James E. O'grady, Sheriff of Cook County, and Kelvin Branch, Deputy Sheriff of Cook CountySeventh Circuit· 1993-01-05· cited 167×
- Patricia Burdett v. Robert S. MillerSeventh Circuit· 1992-05-01· cited 137×
- Scientific Holding Company, Ltd. v. Plessey IncorporatedSecond Circuit· 1974-12-20· cited 105×
- Merrill Lynch Interfunding, Inc. v. Patrick Argenti and Jean Argenti, Defendants-Counter-Claimants-AppelleesSecond Circuit· 1998-08-28· cited 103×
- Perkins v. SilversteinSeventh Circuit· 1991-08-07· cited 73×
- Peter G. Kohler and Walter J. Kohler v. Leslie Hindman, Inc., an Illinois Corporation, and Richard M. ThuneSeventh Circuit· 1996-04-05· cited 68×
- Caspi v. Microsoft Network, LLCNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1999-07-02· cited 60×
- Barnett v. Network Solutions, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2001-01-11· cited 57×
- Forrest v. Verizon Communications, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2002-08-29· cited 48×
- Klos v. Polskie Linie LotniczeSecond Circuit· 1997-12-08· cited 48×
- Gramercy Mills, Inc., and Cross-Appellee v. Myron Wolens, AndSeventh Circuit· 1995-08-15· cited 45×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.