Smith v. Pizza Hut, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the law is clear that employers are only required to reimburse employees if the uniforms require some kind of special treatment, i.e. dry- cleaning”
• stating that “the law is clear that employers are only required to reimburse employees if the uniforms require some kind of special treatment, i.e. dry- cleaning”
• “Plaintiffs cannot rectify their pleading deficiencies by asserting new facts in an opposition to a motion to dismiss.”
• “Plaintiffs cannot rectify their pleading deficiencies by asserting new facts in an opposition to a motion to dismiss.”
• “Plaintiffs cannot rectify their pleading deficiencies by asserting new facts in an opposition to a motion to dismiss.” (citing Perkins v. Silverstein, 939 F.2d 463, 471 (7th Cir. 1991)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).