Performance Team Freight Systems, Inc. v. Aleman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Labor Code section 229 provides an exception 25 under California law to th[e] general rule favoring arbitrability.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Garcia v. Pexco, LLC
  California Court of Appeal· 2017-04-24· cited 58×
• Esparza v. KS Indus., L.P.
  California Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2017-08-02· cited 48×
• Oliveira v. New Prime, Inc.
  First Circuit· 2017-05-12· cited 42×
• Clifford v. Quest Software Inc.
  California Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2019-07-23· cited 31×
• Subcontracting Concepts (CT), LLC v. De Melo
  California Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2019-04-10· cited 24×
• Muller v. Roy Miller Freight Lines, LLC
  California Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2019-05-01· cited 17×
• Muro v. Cornerstone Staffing Solutions, Inc.
  California Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2018-02-23· cited 16×
• Oto, L. L.C. v. Kho
  California Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2017-08-21· cited 2×
• Esparza v. KS Industries
  California Court of Appeal· 2017-08-02
• OTO, L.L.C. v. Kho
  California Court of Appeal· 2017-08-22
• Muro v. Cornerstone Staffing Solutions
  California Court of Appeal· 2018-02-23
• Subcontracting Concepts (CT), LLC v. De Melo
  California Court of Appeal· 2019-04-10
• Clifford v. Quest Software Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2019-08-14
• Betancourt v. Transportation Brokerage Specialists, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2021-03-29
• Nixon v. AmeriHome Mortgage Co., LLC
  California Court of Appeal· 2021-08-16
• Ahern v. Asset Management Consultants
  California Court of Appeal· 2022-02-01
• Mendoza v. Trans Valley Transport
  California Court of Appeal· 2022-03-01
• Barrera v. Apple American Group LLC
  California Court of Appeal· 2023-08-31
• Mondragon v. Sunrun Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2024-04-23

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1983-02-23· cited 9,657×
• At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications Workers
  Supreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 4,474×
• Southland Corp. v. Keating
  Supreme Court· 1984-01-23· cited 1,927×
• Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Adams
  Supreme Court· 2001-03-21· cited 1,312×
• Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.
  California Supreme Court· 2000-08-24· cited 1,269×
• Perry v. Thomas
  Supreme Court· 1987-06-15· cited 1,187×
• Moncharsh v. Heily & Blase
  California Supreme Court· 1992-07-30· cited 753×
• Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.
  California Supreme Court· 1997-06-30· cited 717×
• Pinnacle Museum Tower Ass'n v. Pinnacle Market Development (US), LLC
  California Supreme Court· 2012-08-16· cited 552×
• Rosenthal v. Great Western Financial Securities Corp.
  California Supreme Court· 1996-12-12· cited 513×
• S. G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Department of Industrial Relations
  California Supreme Court· 1989-03-23· cited 309×
• Sanchez v. Valencia Holding Co.
  California Supreme Court· 2015-08-03· cited 283×
• Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. Moreno
  California Supreme Court· 2013-10-17· cited 282×
• Little v. Auto Stiegler, Inc.
  California Supreme Court· 2003-02-27· cited 245×
• Cable Connection, Inc. v. DirecTV, Inc.
  California Supreme Court· 2008-08-25· cited 216×
• Simula, Inc. v. Autoliv, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 1999-04-30· cited 171×
• Ajamian v. Cantorco2e. L.P.
  California Court of Appeal· 2012-02-16· cited 128×
• Serafin v. Balco Properties Ltd., LLC
  California Court of Appeal· 2015-03-16· cited 127×
• Narayan v. EGL, INC.
  Ninth Circuit· 2010-07-13· cited 110×
• Samaniego v. Empire Today, LLC
  California Court of Appeal· 2012-04-05· cited 101×