Clifford v. Quest Software Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the relevant cause of action did not seek public injunctive relief and that arbitration therefore could be compelled without addressing whether the Broughton-Cruz rule was preempted
• concluding that the relevant cause of action did not seek public injunctive relief and that arbitration therefore could be compelled without addressing whether the Broughton-Cruz rule was preempted
• holding that the relevant cause 23 of action did not seek public injunctive relief and that arbitration therefore could be compelled 24 without addressing whether the Broughton-Cruz rule was preempted
• requested injunctive relief concerning wages and hours would primarily benefit defendant Quest Software’s “current employees” rather than “the public at large”
• requested injunctive relief concerning wages and hours would primarily benefit defendant Quest Software’s “current employees” rather than “the public at large”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Brandon Hodges v. Comcast Cable Communications
  Ninth Circuit· 2021-09-10· cited 27×
• Torrecillas v. Fitness International
  California Court of Appeal· 2020-07-21
• Mejia v. DACM Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2020-09-15
• Maldonado v. Fast Auto Loans
  California Court of Appeal· 2021-02-08
• Brandon Hodges v. Comcast Cable Communications
  Ninth Circuit· 2021-12-23
• People v. Maplebear Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2022-05-18
• People v. Maplebear Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2022-06-06
• People v. Maplebear Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2022-07-28
• Vaughn v. Tesla, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2023-01-04
• Ramsey v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLC
  California Court of Appeal· 2024-01-29
• Kramer v. Coinbase, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2024-10-04
• Kahn v. Coinbase, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2025-10-23

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC
  California Supreme Court· 2014-06-23· cited 615×
• McGill v. Citibank, N.A.
  California Supreme Court· 2017-04-06· cited 232×
• Dynamex Operations W., Inc. v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty.
  California Supreme Court· 2018-04-30· cited 197×
• Broughton v. Cigna Healthplans
  California Supreme Court· 1999-12-02· cited 190×
• Matthew Kilgore v. Keybank, National Association
  Ninth Circuit· 2013-04-11· cited 182×
• Sullivan v. Oracle Corp.
  California Supreme Court· 2011-06-30· cited 131×
• Nelsen v. Legacy Partners Residential, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2012-07-18· cited 84×
• Kevin Ferguson v. Corinthian Colleges, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2013-10-28· cited 79×
• Alch v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 2004-09-14· cited 61×
• Hodge v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 2006-11-29· cited 31×
• Performance Team Freight Systems, Inc. v. Aleman
  California Court of Appeal· 2015-11-02· cited 27×
• Herr v. Nestlé U.S.A., Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2003-06-12· cited 13×
• Cruz v. PacifiCare Health Systems, Inc.
  California Supreme Court· 2003-04-24· cited 2×

Other cases named Clifford v. Quest Software Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Clifford v. Quest Software Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2019-08-14