California Supreme Court· 8/3/2015
Sanchez v. Valencia Holding Co.
Citations
- 61 Cal. 4th 899
- 353 P.3d 741
- 190 Cal. Rptr. 3d 812
- 2015 Cal. LEXIS 5292
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Concepcion applies to the Consumers Legal Remedies Act to the extent that it would have the same effect as Discover Bank
- holding that Concepcion applies to the Consumers Legal Remedies Act to the extent that it would have the same effect as Discover Bank
- holding that a fee shifting clause affecting unwaivable statutory rights is unenforceable and unconscionable
- explaining that any “obligation to highlight the arbitration clause of [the] contract ... would be preempted by the [Federal Arbitration Act]”
- assuming that a small claims carve-out in an automobile finance contract likely favored the consumer
- assuming that a small claims carve-out in an automobile finance contract likely favored the consumer
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cantil-Sakauye, Chin, Corrigan, Cuellar, Kruger, Liu, Werdegar
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.