California Supreme Court· 8/3/2015

Sanchez v. Valencia Holding Co.

Citations

61 Cal. 4th 899
353 P.3d 741
190 Cal. Rptr. 3d 812
2015 Cal. LEXIS 5292

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that Concepcion applies to the Consumers Legal Remedies Act to the extent that it would have the same effect as Discover Bank
holding that Concepcion applies to the Consumers Legal Remedies Act to the extent that it would have the same effect as Discover Bank
holding that a fee shifting clause affecting unwaivable statutory rights is unenforceable and unconscionable
explaining that any “obligation to highlight the arbitration clause of [the] contract ... would be preempted by the [Federal Arbitration Act]”
assuming that a small claims carve-out in an automobile finance contract likely favored the consumer
assuming that a small claims carve-out in an automobile finance contract likely favored the consumer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cantil-Sakauye, Chin, Corrigan, Cuellar, Kruger, Liu, Werdegar

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

105 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.