Klamath Siskiyou Wildlands Center v. United States Bureau of Land Management

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the District 27 Court “must review de novo the portions of the [Magistrate Judge’s] recommendations to 28 which the parties object”
• stating that the district court “must review de novo 1 the portions of the [magistrate judge’s] recommendations to which the parties object”
• explaining that a district court 8 “must review de novo the portions of the [Magistrate Judge’s] recommendations to which 9 the parties object”
• explaining that the District 1 Court “must review de novo the portions of the [Magistrate Judge’s] recommendations to 2 which the parties object”
• stating that the district court “must review de novo 7 the portions of the [magistrate judge’s] recommendations to which the parties object”
• holding the 16 dismissal on mootness grounds could not provide enforceable relief even if the court itself 17 “explained that its ruling was based ‘upon [defendant’s] commitment to undertake (or not to take) 18 certain specific actions.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).