Tenth Circuit· 8/21/2012
Iqbal v. Holder
Citations
- 693 F.3d 1189
- 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 17681
- 2012 WL 3570716
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a party qualifies for attorneys fees as “prevailing party” under the EAJA if the party receives a court order in its favor that “entitle[s] that party to some method of enforcing the merits of the claim’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holmes, Brorby, Ebel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.