New York County Courts· 7/15/1988
People v. Wesley
Citations
- 140 Misc. 2d 306
- 533 N.Y.S.2d 643
- 1988 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 535
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reducing “overall claimed mean power of identity . . . to eliminate any possible Hardy-Weinberg disequilibrium”
- finding DNA typing generally acceptable and allowing extraction of blood samples to conduct DNA testing
- finding DNA typing generally acceptable and allowing extraction of blood samples to conduct DNA testing
- expert believes that there is population substructuring but that this could be accounted for by adjusting the claimed power of identity of Cellmark test by a factor of ten to one in 140,000,000 for Caucasians and one in 84,000,000 for blacks
- scientific bases of DNA/RFLP testing
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harris
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
66 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. WesleyNew York Court of Appeals· 1994-03-29· cited 282×
- Roberson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2000-04-13· cited 277×
- State v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-11-03· cited 141×
- People v. CastroNew York Supreme Court· 1989-08-14· cited 137×
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1995-01-31· cited 124×
- Commonwealth v. CurninMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1991-01-24· cited 124×
- Caldwell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1990-07-03· cited 123×
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri· 1991-07-23· cited 107×
- Commonwealth v. RodgersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-02-26· cited 98×
- Polk v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1992-12-31· cited 93×
- State v. AndersonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1994-08-25· cited 90×
- State v. LyonsOregon Supreme Court· 1996-10-11· cited 81×
- United States v. PorterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-12-22· cited 78×
- State v. PierceOhio Supreme Court· 1992-09-02· cited 78×
- State v. VandebogartSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1992-11-20· cited 75×
- Ex Parte PerrySupreme Court of Alabama· 1991-04-19· cited 69×
- Hopkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1991-11-01· cited 68×
- Darryl N. Veazey v. Communications & Cable of Chicago, Inc., D/B/A Tci Communications, Inc., Chicago Cable Tv, Tci Chicago or Tci-Chicago CableSeventh Circuit· 1999-10-20· cited 60×
- United States v. Matthew Sylvester Two Bulls, A/K/A Matthew Sylvester Two Bulls, Jr.Eighth Circuit· 1990-10-31· cited 58×
- Smith v. DeppishSupreme Court of Kansas· 1991-03-01· cited 55×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.