Skip to main content
· 3/1/1991

Smith v. Deppish

Citations

  • 807 P.2d 144
  • 248 Kan. 217
  • 1991 Kan. LEXIS 45

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that results of RFLP testing may be inadmissible on grounds of relevancy or prejudice, or because of sample contamination or chain of custody question
  • concluding that results of RFLP testing may be inadmissible on grounds of relevancy or prejudice, or because of sample contamination or chain of custody questions
  • concluding that while Frye is met if evidence and technique are both generally accepted, evidence may nonetheless be excluded on other bases such as irrelevancy, test samples prejudice, or contamination
  • concluding that while Frye is met if evidence and technique are both generally accepted, evidence may nonetheless be excluded on other bases such as irrelevancy, test samples prejudice, or contamination
  • finding reliability of procedures sufficiently established, and no abuse of discretion in admitting DNA evidence
  • DNA print testing and Restriction Fragment Link Polymorphism Analysis admissible, recognized as reliable and generally accepted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lockett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.