· 3/1/1991
Smith v. Deppish
Citations
- 807 P.2d 144
- 248 Kan. 217
- 1991 Kan. LEXIS 45
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that results of RFLP testing may be inadmissible on grounds of relevancy or prejudice, or because of sample contamination or chain of custody question
- concluding that results of RFLP testing may be inadmissible on grounds of relevancy or prejudice, or because of sample contamination or chain of custody questions
- concluding that while Frye is met if evidence and technique are both generally accepted, evidence may nonetheless be excluded on other bases such as irrelevancy, test samples prejudice, or contamination
- concluding that while Frye is met if evidence and technique are both generally accepted, evidence may nonetheless be excluded on other bases such as irrelevancy, test samples prejudice, or contamination
- finding reliability of procedures sufficiently established, and no abuse of discretion in admitting DNA evidence
- DNA print testing and Restriction Fragment Link Polymorphism Analysis admissible, recognized as reliable and generally accepted
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lockett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.