People v. Jackson (On Reconsideration)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that a “remand is not required under Lockridge” when a scoring change “would not alter defendant’s guidelines minimum sentence range.”
• providing that a “remand is not required under Lockridge” when a scoring change “would not alter defendant’s guidelines minimum sentence range.”
• providing that the prosecution was permitted to comment on two of its witnesses’ credibility after defense counsel repeatedly attacked the witnesses’ truthfulness because of their drug use
• explaining that the term “prosecutorial misconduct” has become a term of art often used to describe any error committed by the prosecution but should only be used in the most extreme cases
• emphasizing that “judicial fact-finding remains an important component of Michigan’s sentencing scheme post-Lockridge.”
• emphasizing that “judicial fact-finding remains an important component of Michigan’s sentencing scheme post-Lockridge.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).