Michigan Supreme Court· 7/29/2015

People v. Lockridge

Citations

498 Mich. 358
870 N.W.2d 502
2015 Mich. LEXIS 1774

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that there was no due process violation where the sentencing court vacated the defendant’s original sentence and imposed the exact same sentence
recognizing that rendering the sentencing guidelines advisory “requires the least judicial rewriting of the statute[.]”
holding that “[a] sentence that departs from the applicable guidelines range will be reviewed by an appellate court for reasonableness”
ruling that sentencing courts “must continue to consult the applicable guidelines range and take it into account when imposing sentence”
holding that there was no due process violation where the sentencing court vacated the defendant’s original sentence and imposed the exact same sentence
ruling that Michigan’s mandatory sentencing guidelines violated the Sixth Amendment and making them advisory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Young, Kelly, Viviano, Bernstein, McCormack, Zahra, Markman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

289 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

64 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. Lockridge

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.