People v. Turner
Citations
- 39 Cal. 370
Syllabus
<p>Criminal Practice.—After an issue of fact is joined, every step taken for the purpose of a determination of that issue, up to and including the verdict upon such issue, must he regarded as “ arising during the course of the trial.”</p> <p>Idem.—Motion for New Trial.—Any substantial error of the Court, on a question or matter arising during the course of the trial, is a proper ground for a motion for a new trial.</p> <p>Idem.—A motion for a new trial cannot he based upon any objection to the sufficiency or validity of the indictment, or upon any errors or irregularities occurring in the proceedings, before issue of fact joined by plea.</p> <p>Idem.—Appeal.—On an appeal from an order refusing or granting a new trial, on the ground of error or irregularity arising during the course of the trial, the appellate Court is confined to a review of the proceedings between issue joined and the rendition of the verdict.</p> <p>Idem.—Pleading.—Demurrer.—Demurrer to the form or sufficiency of the indictment, or to the jurisdiction of the Court, must he taken prior to the joinder of issue of fact by plea.</p> <p>Idem. —Motion to Set Aside Indictment. —The defendant, when not previously held to answer, must avail himself of errors and irregularities in the proceedings resulting in the presentation of the indictment, by motion, to set aside the indictment before plea.</p> <p>Idem.—Appeal from Final Judgment.—The action of the Court on demurrer, or on the motion to set aside the indictment, can only be reviewed on appeal from the final judgment.</p> <p>Idem.—Motion in Arrest of Judgment. — Objections which may he presented by demurrer, may further be made available after verdict, by motion in arrest of judgment, and the action of the Court on this motion can only be reviewed on appeal from the judgment.</p> <p>Idem.—Juror.—Improper Influence.—Presumption.—A person who has been sworn on his voire dire and accepted as a juror, and afterwards engages in conversation with, or voluntar
Judges: Crockett, Sprague
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. OverstreetCalifornia Supreme Court· 1986-11-13· cited 305×
- People v. MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1978-06-22· cited 78×
- People v. StokesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1894-06-23· cited 60×
- People v. ChuckCalifornia Supreme Court· 1889-03-05· cited 55×
- People v. DarcyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1943-06-25· cited 43×
- People v. TraversCalifornia Supreme Court· 1891-03-05· cited 35×
- In re MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court· 1898-03-25· cited 35×
- State v. MorganUtah Supreme Court· 1901-02-02· cited 29×
- Alpers v. HuntCalifornia Supreme Court· 1890-09-27· cited 26×
- People v. DuncanCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1942-02-26· cited 13×
- People v. VillarinoCalifornia Supreme Court· 1884-12-15· cited 11×
- People v. JohnstonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1940-03-04· cited 10×
- People v. TriplettCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1945-08-17· cited 7×
- Bice v. StevensCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1954-12-03· cited 6×
- People v. LovleeCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1939-11-21· cited 3×
- Douglass v. ByrnesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada· 1894-07-09· cited 2×
- Pueblo v. RosaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1917-11-30· cited 1×
- People v. RosaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1917-11-30
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.