In re Mitchell
Citations
- 120 Cal. 384
- 52 P. 799
- 1898 Cal. LEXIS 776
Syllabus
<p>Police Coubt oe Los Angeles.—The police court of the City of Los Angeles was lawfully organized under the act of March 18, 1885, known as the Whitney act, providing for police courts in cities having thirty thousand and under one hundred thousand inhabitants; and the act of February, 1897, authorizing any city or city and county of the state to take its census, under which Los Angeles was then found to have more than one hundred thousand inhabitants, did not work an implied repeal of the act under which the police court was organized; nor .did the increase of population operate to discontinue the court which was lawfully organized under that act, in the absence of further legislative action to that end.</p>
Judges: Henshaw, McFarland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Gibson v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court· 1945-02-16· cited 35×
- Levy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1940-07-23· cited 31×
- Orange County Water District v. FarnsworthCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1956-01-17· cited 18×
- People v. BurnsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1898-07-25· cited 18×
- In Re ShearN.D. California· 1956-01-31· cited 17×
- Orange County Water Dist. v. FarnsworthCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1956-01-17· cited 14×
- Copeland v. RaubCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1940-01-03· cited 10×
- Ex Parte FedderwitzCalifornia Supreme Court· 1900-11-26· cited 10×
- State ex rel. Hughes v. ReusswigSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1910-04-29· cited 10×
- Carson v. LamptonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1937-11-19· cited 5×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- City of Pasadena v. StimsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1891-09-16· cited 178×
- United States v. ClaflinSupreme Court· 1878-12-18· cited 150×
- People ex rel. Daniels v. HenshawCalifornia Supreme Court· 1888-06-07· cited 57×
- Darcy v. Mayor of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court· 1894-12-03· cited 56×
- People v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1870-07-01· cited 33×
- Rawson v. RawsonIllinois Supreme Court· 1869-09-15· cited 32×
- People v. PlattCalifornia Supreme Court· 1885-05-14· cited 27×
- Jacobs v. Bd. of Supervisors of S.F.California Supreme Court· 1893-10-14· cited 25×
- Rauer v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1897-09-27· cited 22×
- Burnham v. HaysCalifornia Supreme Court· 1853-04-15· cited 12×
- Cullerton v. MeadCalifornia Supreme Court· 1863-07-01· cited 11×
- Perry v. AmesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1864-10-15· cited 9×
- Daubenspeck v. GrearCalifornia Supreme Court· 1861-07-01· cited 7×
- People ex rel. Pennie v. RansomCalifornia Supreme Court· 1881-07-01· cited 7×
- Bishop v. City of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court· 1881-07-01· cited 7×
- Coggins v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court· 1881-11-15· cited 7×
- Jenks v. City of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court· 1881-07-01· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.