People v. Stokes
Citations
- 103 Cal. 193
- 37 P. 207
- 1894 Cal. LEXIS 747
Syllabus
<p>Criminal Law—Jurisdiction of Offense—Creation of New County— Dismissal of Prosecution in Old County—Jeopardy.—A newly-created county has jurisdiction of a defendant charged with the commission of an offense prior to the creation of the new county, and upon territory within its boundary lines; and the fact that at the date of the creation of the new county a prosecution for the offense was pending against him in the old county is no bar to a prosecution in the new county, where the former prosecution was dismissed prior to the commencement of the prosecution in the new county, and no jeopardy had attached prior to the dismissal.</p> <p>Id.—New Trial—Reading of Newspaper Article in Jury-room.— Where, upon a motion for a new trial in a criminal case, it is shown by the evidence of the officer in charge of the jury that the jurors, after retiring to deliberate upon their verdict, read an article in a local newspaper containing a report of the evidence in the case, including certain evidence which the court had ruled to be inadmissible, and also containing intimations that two of the jurors had been corrupted, and no contrary showing is made by affidavits of the jurors, or otherwise, a new trial should be granted.</p> <p>Id.—Influence of Jurors—Presumption—Misconduct of Jury.—The reading by the jurors in a criminal case of a newspaper article published during the pendency of the trial, which states that “It is currently reported on the streets that the jury will fail to bring in a verdict, and that two men will hang the jury; it is also believed that the two men are known, and that the whereabouts of ‘Colonel Mazuma’ are also known,” will be presumed to have influenced the jurors, and a new trial should be granted for misconduct of the jury in reading the article.</p>
Judges: Garoutte
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court· 1991-05-06· cited 549×
- People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court· 1990-05-17· cited 381×
- People v. BurgenerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1986-03-27· cited 357×
- Hasson v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court· 1982-09-16· cited 240×
- People v. BeelerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1995-04-10· cited 218×
- People v. HutchinsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1969-06-18· cited 193×
- People v. HoneycuttCalifornia Supreme Court· 1977-11-08· cited 174×
- People v. HollowayCalifornia Supreme Court· 1990-05-31· cited 99×
- People v. ConklingCalifornia Supreme Court· 1896-03-21· cited 84×
- People v. MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1978-06-22· cited 78×
- People v. SassounianCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1986-05-30· cited 72×
- People v. PhillipsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1981-07-28· cited 54×
- People v. ManchettiCalifornia Supreme Court· 1946-12-18· cited 53×
- People v. LearyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1895-01-05· cited 45×
- State ex rel. Superior Court of Snohomish County v. SperryWashington Supreme Court· 1971-04-08· cited 41×
- Saltzman v. Sunset Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court· 1899-07-29· cited 39×
- People v. AzoffCalifornia Supreme Court· 1895-01-17· cited 37×
- State v. AdamoWashington Supreme Court· 1924-02-14· cited 36×
- State v. LangleyOregon Supreme Court· 1958-03-19· cited 32×
- Kritzer v. CitronCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1950-12-08· cited 30×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Woodward v. LeavittMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1871-09-15· cited 166×
- People v. GoldensonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1888-05-29· cited 105×
- United States v. DawsonSupreme Court· 1854-01-31· cited 35×
- People v. BackusCalifornia Supreme Court· 1855-07-01· cited 33×
- People v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1870-07-01· cited 33×
- People v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court· 1893-11-11· cited 31×
- People v. McCoyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1886-12-09· cited 26×
- People v. BranniganCalifornia Supreme Court· 1863-07-01· cited 23×
- Keenan v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court· 1859-06-15· cited 23×
- People v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court· 1890-08-11· cited 16×
- State v. DonaldsonTennessee Supreme Court· 1870-11-09· cited 6×
- Murrah v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1875-10-15· cited 6×
- Commonwealth v. WormleyGeneral Court of Virginia· 1852-06-30· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.