Skip to main content
· 7/1/1863

People v. Brannigan

Citations

  • 21 Cal. 337

Syllabus

<p>Wheke the jury in a criminal action, after having retired to deliberate upon their verdict, separate without permission of the Court, the irregularity is sufficient ground for setting aside a verdict of guilty rendered by them, unless it be shown affirmatively by the prosecution that the defendant was not prejudiced thereby.</p> <p>A verdict of guilty in a criminal action will not be set aside on a showing that a third person expressed in the presence of the jury, while they were deliberating upon their verdict, a wish that the defendant should be convicted, where the expression appears to have been a mere passing remark and not part of a conversation in which the jury engaged.</p>

Judges: Field

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.