People v. Thomann

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• possession of videotape of child pornography on one date was separate act from possession of advertisements containing similar material nearly two months later
• where defendant charged with offense of possession and dissemination of videotaped child pornography, and later with offense of possession of advertisement containing child pornography, section 3—3(b
• possession of videotape of child pornography on one date was separate act from possession of advertisements containing similar material nearly two months later
• where defendant charged with offense of possession and dissemination of videotaped child pornography, and later with offense of possession of advertisement containing child pornography, 3-3(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).