Skip to main content
· 3/2/1994

People v. Hieber

Citations

  • 629 N.E.2d 235
  • 258 Ill. App. 3d 144
  • 195 Ill. Dec. 927

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • motion to suppress granted June 24; timely motion to reconsider denied August 10; notice of appeal filed within 30 days thereafter
  • affidavit of police officer seeking warrant was “a conclusory statement based on his own bare conclusions”
  • motion to suppress granted June 24; timely motion to reconsider denied August 10; notice of appeal filed within 30 days thereafter
  • affidavit of police officer seeking warrant was “a conclusory statement based on his own bare conclusions”
  • affidavit of police officer seeking warrant was “a conclusory statement based on his own bare conclusions”
  • “In the present matter, we are not met with a close question of probable cause”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McLAREN

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.