People v. Schubert

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “the best evidence of whether material constitutes child pornography is the material itself,” as a jury may rely on its observations and common experiences to “assess the age of the children depicted”
• “A proper foundation for the admission of an exhibit may be laid either through identification by a witness, or through establishment of a chain of possession, and it is not necessary to require both methods.”
• “Just as the trier of fact can determine what constitutes obscenity [citation], so can it, based on everyday observations and common experiences, assess the age of the children depicted with the requisite degree of certainty to satisfy the standard of proof beyond a reasonable doubt.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).