Illinois Supreme Court· 10/25/1989

People v. Terrell

Citations

547 N.E.2d 145
132 Ill. 2d 178
138 Ill. Dec. 176
1989 Ill. LEXIS 142

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that “[a] person lacks standing to challenge the constitutionality of a statute unless he is directly affected by the alleged unconstitutionality” (citing People v. Haywood, 118 Ill. 2d 263, 275 (1987))
holding that “[a] person lacks standing to challenge the constitutionality of a statute unless he is directly affected by the alleged unconstitutionality” (citing People v. Haywood, 118 Ill. 2d 263, 275 (1987))
holding that “[a] person lacks standing to challenge the constitutionality of a statute unless he is directly affected by the alleged unconstitutionality” (citing People v. Haywood, 118 Ill. 2d 263, 275 (1987))
holding that “[a] person lacks standing to challenge the constitutionality of a statute unless he is directly affected by the alleged unconstitutionality” (citing People v. Haywood, 118 Ill. 2d 263, 275 (1987))
limiting the statutory requirements to subjects “under 18 years of age”
“Although the statute we are discussing authorizes the imposition of consecutive sentences, rather than extended terms of imprisonment, it too concerns a sentence of ‘imprisonment’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ward, Miller, Stamos, Ryan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

131 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

68 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. Terrell

65 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.