Illinois Supreme Court· 1/29/2001
People v. Edwards
Citations
- 745 N.E.2d 1212
- 195 Ill. 2d 142
- 253 Ill. Dec. 678
- 2001 Ill. LEXIS 7
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that defense counsel is not ineffective for failing to make a fruitless argument
- holding that defense counsel is not ineffective for failing to make a fruitless argument
- stating that defense counsel cannot be considered ineffective for failing to make or pursue meritless objections
- explaining reviewing courts generally will not second-guess a matter involving trial strategy
- “[c]ounsel cannot be considered ineffective for failing to make or pursue what would have been a meritless objection”
- “Counsel cannot be considered ineffective for failing to make or pursue what would have been a meritless objection.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Miller, Harrison
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
83 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. JacksonIllinois Supreme Court· 2001-12-20· cited 116×
- People v. MakielAppellate Court of Illinois· 2005-06-03· cited 96×
- People v. WilbornAppellate Court of Illinois· 2011-09-23· cited 82×
- People v. LacyAppellate Court of Illinois· 2011-02-10· cited 77×
- People v. HouseAppellate Court of Illinois· 2017-04-21· cited 65×
- People v. CrawfordAppellate Court of Illinois· 2014-02-13· cited 62×
- People v. DeSantiagoAppellate Court of Illinois· 2006-04-28· cited 54×
- People v. LopezAppellate Court of Illinois· 2012-06-22· cited 54×
- People v. PabelloAppellate Court of Illinois· 2019-12-09· cited 53×
- People v. DoneganAppellate Court of Illinois· 2012-06-26· cited 47×
- People v. ThomasAppellate Court of Illinois· 2006-03-09· cited 43×
- People v. DiazAppellate Court of Illinois· 2007-11-05· cited 42×
- People v. ColeAppellate Court of Illinois· 2012-09-21· cited 38×
- People v. CollinsAppellate Court of Illinois· 2021-03-31· cited 37×
- People v. SharpAppellate Court of Illinois· 2015-03-17· cited 36×
- People v. MaciasAppellate Court of Illinois· 2015-08-21· cited 34×
- People v. MimsAppellate Court of Illinois· 2010-08-20· cited 34×
- People v. CampbellAppellate Court of Illinois· 2002-07-26· cited 33×
- People v. StephensAppellate Court of Illinois· 2012-10-26· cited 33×
- People v. CarterAppellate Court of Illinois· 2005-12-22· cited 32×
Cites
41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 8,679×
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 8,539×
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1968-06-03· cited 4,818×
- Powers v. OhioSupreme Court· 1991-04-01· cited 2,917×
- People v. ColemanIllinois Supreme Court· 1998-10-01· cited 1,609×
- People v. FloresIllinois Supreme Court· 1992-11-19· cited 538×
- People v. BullIllinois Supreme Court· 1998-11-10· cited 417×
- People v. HendersonIllinois Supreme Court· 1990-11-30· cited 387×
- People v. BaptistIllinois Supreme Court· 1979-05-18· cited 355×
- People v. StewartIllinois Supreme Court· 1984-10-19· cited 354×
- People v. WestIllinois Supreme Court· 1999-09-23· cited 309×
- People v. SpreitzerIllinois Supreme Court· 1988-03-23· cited 305×
- People v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court· 1993-02-18· cited 304×
- People v. ColemanIllinois Supreme Court· 1995-11-02· cited 297×
- People v. PalmerIllinois Supreme Court· 1994-10-20· cited 295×
- People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court· 1994-05-19· cited 272×
- People v. ChildressIllinois Supreme Court· 2000-04-20· cited 229×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.