Supreme Court of Colorado· 2/25/2002
People v. Taylor
Citations
- 41 P.3d 681
- 2002 WL 257530
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that defendant was in custody when, after he exited the vehicle, he was \encircled\ and \pinned\ by law enforcement
- finding custody when defendant w as detained in a “police dominated atmosphere where the officers used physical force to control [d]efendant’s movement”
- The defendant “was surrounded by armed uniformed police officers and their patrol cars and was ‘essentially encircled next to the pickup truck while the interrogation occurred.’”
- the fact that defendant “was surrounded by armed uniformed police officers and their patrol cars and was essentially encircled ... while the interrogation occurred,” rendered him “completely at the mercy of the police,” and, therefore, in custody (quotations omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Martinez, Mullarkey, Rice
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Cardman v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2019-07-01· cited 412×
- People v. MathenySupreme Court of Colorado· 2002-05-20· cited 365×
- People v. PleshakovSupreme Court of Colorado· 2013-03-25· cited 233×
- People v. BairdColorado Court of Appeals· 2002-11-07· cited 221×
- People v. TheanderSupreme Court of Colorado· 2013-02-25· cited 182×
- Tidwell v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado· 2003-11-10· cited 124×
- Commonwealth v. CatanzaroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2004-02-13· cited 62×
- People v. NullSupreme Court of Colorado· 2010-06-21· cited 51×
- People v. PlattSupreme Court of Colorado· 2004-01-12· cited 42×
- People v. HankinsSupreme Court of Colorado· 2009-02-23· cited 32×
- People v. BegaySupreme Court of Colorado· 2014-05-27· cited 24×
- State v. TurmelSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2003-12-29· cited 22×
- People v. HoltSupreme Court of Colorado· 2010-06-21· cited 19×
- People v. MumfordColorado Court of Appeals· 2010-03-18· cited 10×
- People v. RothColorado Court of Appeals· 2003-08-14· cited 8×
- People v. PascualSupreme Court of Colorado· 2005-05-16· cited 7×
- People v. RuchColorado Court of Appeals· 2013-06-20· cited 7×
- People v. BerdahlColorado Court of Appeals· 2012-10-25· cited 6×
- People v. VeriganColorado Court of Appeals· 2015-09-24· cited 4×
- People v. AarnessColorado Court of Appeals· 2005-08-01· cited 3×
Cites
55 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1970-05-04· cited 7,191×
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-05-15· cited 7,105×
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 5,571×
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 5,549×
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 4,856×
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court· 1991-06-20· cited 4,435×
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court· 1986-12-10· cited 4,016×
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 3,736×
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 3,675×
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court· 1967-06-05· cited 3,591×
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court· 1981-09-23· cited 3,483×
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court· 1977-12-05· cited 3,269×
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court· 1985-03-04· cited 2,824×
- Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1994-04-26· cited 2,603×
- United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court· 1976-07-06· cited 2,153×
- Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1980-01-21· cited 2,082×
- California v. BehelerSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 2,048×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.