Skip to main content

People v. Tanner

Citations

  • 491 N.E.2d 776
  • 142 Ill. App. 3d 165
  • 96 Ill. Dec. 497
  • 1986 Ill. App. LEXIS 2042

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing that although the definition of “sexual penetration” includes alternative acts listed in the disjunctive, the type of sexual penetration is not an element of the offense and its inclusion in a charging instrument is mere surplusage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wombacher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.