Skip to main content

State v. Eaton

Citations

  • 191 P.3d 1270

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that surplus information in charging document does not require reversal unless “it prejudices the accused either by misleading him in making his defense or by exposing him to double jeopardy”
  • explaining that surplus information in charging document does not require reversal unless “it prejudices the accused either by misleading him in making his defense or by exposing him to double jeopardy”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Madsen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.