The PEOPLE v. Simpkins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no fatal variance where the defendants were charged with disturbing the peace by firing a revolver but were found guilty based on different acts
• where the defendants were charged with mob action in that they disturbed the peace “by firing a revolver,” but the evidence showed that they disturbed the peace differently, the phrase “by firing a revolver” was surplusage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).