People v. Gardner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding defendants are “not entitled to credit for time spent in custody while incarcerated in another state as the result of a crime committed there, even if a detainer warrant is served on the defendant in that state”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Velasco
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-07-16· cited 29×
• People v. Rhoden
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1998-10-06· cited 26×
• People v. Wills
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-11-09· cited 14×
• People v. Jones
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-09-28· cited 12×
• Gardner v. Norris
  E.D. Arkansas· 1996-12-12· cited 10×
• People v. Traven C.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2008-08-22· cited 9×
• People v. Warren
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-08-28· cited 5×
• People v. Elder
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2009-06-30· cited 5×
• Patton v. State
  Court of Claims of Illinois· 1994-08-25· cited 5×
• People v. Harrison
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1990-03-27· cited 4×
• People v. Clinard
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-03-11· cited 3×
• In Re TC
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2008-08-22
• People v. Bell
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-08-27

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Enoch
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1988-02-11· cited 3,273×
• People v. Tanner
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1986-03-26· cited 20×
• People v. Roberts
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1977-04-14· cited 6×
• People v. Tucker
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1985-11-20· cited 3×