Illinois Supreme Court· 10/6/2005

People v. Sharpe

Citations

839 N.E.2d 492
216 Ill. 2d 481
298 Ill. Dec. 169
2005 Ill. LEXIS 977

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that “[i]f the legislature determines that the exact same elements merit two different penalties, then one of these penalties has not been set in accordance with the seriousness of the offense”
finding that the legislature considered the use of firearms during the commission of felonies a serious concern, and the enhanced sentences properly reflect the legislature’s intent in this regard
noting that while the provisions articulating the legislature's intent are contained in the armed-violence statute, the findings were enacted as part of Public Act 91-404 and expressed the legislature's intent in enacting the firearm enhancements
indicating that the “cross-comparison challenge and the ‘cruel or degrading’ challenge are separate types of proportionate[Ipenalties challenges and that the latter requires only that the penalty be examined in relation to the offense for which it is applied” (emphasis in original)
explaining the approach of Moss in the process of placing it in the context of the historical development of proportionate penalties analysis
stating that, in order to satisfy due process, “the statute’s prohibitions [must be] sufficiently definite *** to give a person of ordinary intelligence fair warning as to what conduct is prohibited” (quoting People v. Falbe, 189 Ill. 2d 635, 640 (2000))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

199 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

52 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. Sharpe

35 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.