Colorado Court of Appeals· 4/8/2004

People v. Phillips

Citations

91 P.3d 476
2004 Colo. App. LEXIS 526
2004 WL 743704

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that the defendant was preclude d from challenging the trial court’s response to a jury question when t he “defendant acceded to the court’s response”
stating that the defendant was preclude d from challenging the trial court’s response to a jury question when t he “defendant acceded to the court’s response”
declining to apply a structural error analysis t o the trial court’s failure to poll one of the jurors
“[N]o additional instruction is required when the original instructions adequately inform the jury.”
The presumption that a jury understood and heeded instructions “is rebutted where a jury affirmatively indicates it has a fundamental misunderstanding of an instruction it was given.”
“Contrary to the People’s contention, we do not employ a waiver theory.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rothenberg, Nieto, Piccone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.