People v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Ordinarily, a prosecutor has discretion to charge any applicable offense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• People v. Stewart
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2002-09-09· cited 1,181×
• People v. Valdez
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2017-04-06· cited 509×
• People v. Zuniga
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2003-10-23· cited 491×
• Dale v. Guaranty National Insurance Co.
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1997-11-24· cited 66×
• v. Curtis
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2021-08-17· cited 59×
• People v. Richardson
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2002-02-14· cited 49×
• Byrd v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2002-11-18· cited 45×
• People v. Davis
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2008-12-24· cited 24×
• Platt v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2009-02-09· cited 17×
• People v. Prieto
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2005-04-21· cited 15×
• People v. Montante
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2015-04-09· cited 12×
• People v. Tow
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1999-07-22· cited 10×
• People v. Wentling
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2015-12-03· cited 10×
• People v. Margerum
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2018-04-19· cited 8×
• People v. Clanton
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2015-02-12· cited 8×
• v. Lee
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2019-08-22· cited 4×
• Peo v. Tarr
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2024-10-24· cited 4×
• v. Slaughter
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2019-02-21· cited 2×
• The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent v. Wayne Robert STEWART, Respondent/Cross-Petitioner.
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2002-09-09· cited 2×
• People v. Rojas
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2018-02-22