People v. Tow

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the purpose of the statute was merely to achieve uniformity among 16 traffic laws
• \ 'Legislative intent is the polestar of statutory construction.'\ (quoting Schubert v. People, 698 P.2d 788, 793 (Colo. 1985))
• statement of purpose for the Uniform Safety Code said that the purpose of the article was to alleviate conflicts and achieve uniformity among traffic laws
• \[The Uniform Safety Code contains no provisions regulating many forms of intentional conduct in the operation of motor vehicles.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Sharp
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2004-06-17· cited 18×
• People v. Van De Weghe
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2012-11-21· cited 12×
• People v. Montante
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2015-04-09· cited 12×
• People v. Wentling
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2015-12-03· cited 10×
• People v. Stansberry
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2003-09-11· cited 8×
• People v. Clanton
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2015-02-12· cited 8×
• People in Interest of Jam
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2001-09-27· cited 3×
• People v. Rojas
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2018-02-22

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Bagby
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1987-03-30· cited 36×
• People v. Smith
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1997-05-19· cited 25×
• People v. Halstead
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1994-03-10· cited 20×
• People v. Bettis
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1979-08-02· cited 9×

Other cases named People v. Tow

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• People v. Tow
  New York Court of Appeals· 2017-03-31