People v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the defendant's request to speak with an assistant State's Attorney during an interrogation constituted an initiation of further discussions concerning the police investigation
• the defendant initiated further discussion with officers, who did nothing, either by word or action, to initiate conversation with the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• People v. Graham
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2003-06-20· cited 6×

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Edwards v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 6,931×
• Moran v. Burbine
  Supreme Court· 1986-03-10· cited 3,339×
• Oregon v. Elstad
  Supreme Court· 1985-03-04· cited 2,824×
• Oregon v. Bradshaw
  Supreme Court· 1983-06-23· cited 1,351×
• People v. Olivera
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1995-01-19· cited 241×
• People v. Dennis
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1998-02-20· cited 205×
• People v. McCauley
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1994-12-22· cited 188×
• People v. Cortes
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1998-01-23· cited 137×
• People v. Lowery
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1997-12-01· cited 126×
• People v. Dekens
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1998-04-16· cited 74×
• People v. Woolley
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1997-09-25· cited 73×
• People v. Griggs
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1992-11-30· cited 45×
• People v. Wright
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1995-06-09· cited 29×
• People v. Allen
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-04-22· cited 14×