Appellate Court of Illinois· 6/9/1995
People v. Wright
Citations
- 651 N.E.2d 758
- 272 Ill. App. 3d 1033
- 209 Ill. Dec. 580
- 1995 Ill. App. LEXIS 413
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Where the sentencing court examines a presentence report, it is -9- presumed that the court considered the defendant’s potential for rehabilitation.”
- “Where the sentencing court examines a presentence report, it is presumed that the court considered the defendant's potential for rehabilitation.”
- “Where the sentencing court examines a presentence report, it is presumed that the court considered the defendant’s potential for rehabilitation.”
- “where the sentencing court examines a presentence report, it is presumed that the court considered the defendant’s potential for rehabilitation.”
- routine information pertaining to custodial relationship does not violate Edwards
- routine information pertaining to custodial relationship does not violate Edwards
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gordon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. RamosAppellate Court of Illinois· 2004-09-30· cited 98×
- People v. AverettAppellate Court of Illinois· 2008-03-31· cited 78×
- People v. KolzowAppellate Court of Illinois· 1998-11-02· cited 76×
- People v. ParkerAppellate Court of Illinois· 2003-12-05· cited 30×
- People v. StarnesAppellate Court of Illinois· 2007-05-18· cited 27×
- People v. MartinAppellate Court of Illinois· 2012-03-16· cited 23×
- People v. PrinceAppellate Court of Illinois· 2005-12-08· cited 22×
- People v. PeacockAppellate Court of Illinois· 2001-08-21· cited 18×
- People v. AyalaAppellate Court of Illinois· 2008-12-04· cited 7×
- People v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois· 1999-06-08· cited 4×
- People v. Ayala - Corrected on 12/8/08Appellate Court of Illinois· 2008-12-04
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 6,931×
- Oregon v. BradshawSupreme Court· 1983-06-23· cited 1,351×
- People v. La PointeIllinois Supreme Court· 1982-01-29· cited 680×
- People v. WardIllinois Supreme Court· 1992-11-19· cited 284×
- People v. BoclairAppellate Court of Illinois· 1992-02-13· cited 91×
- People v. WilsonIllinois Supreme Court· 1991-04-18· cited 79×
- People v. PowellAppellate Court of Illinois· 1987-08-24· cited 62×
- People v. TrotterAppellate Court of Illinois· 1993-09-15· cited 31×
- People v. ShumateAppellate Court of Illinois· 1981-03-24· cited 30×
- People v. TiradoAppellate Court of Illinois· 1993-09-15· cited 22×
- People v. HicksIllinois Supreme Court· 1989-12-21· cited 20×
- People v. GrayAppellate Court of Illinois· 1991-04-25· cited 18×
- People v. YoungAppellate Court of Illinois· 1987-01-20· cited 14×
- People v. AllenAppellate Court of Illinois· 1993-04-22· cited 14×
- People v. JarrellAppellate Court of Illinois· 1993-06-30· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.