Illinois Supreme Court· 2/2/2006

People v. Johnson

Citations

842 N.E.2d 714
218 Ill. 2d 125
299 Ill. Dec. 677

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

providing that “evidence of a person’s refusal to take a test designed to determine the person’s blood-alcohol content is admissible and may be used to argue the defendant’s consciousness of guilt”
holding “there can be no plain error if there is no error”
“refusal to take a test designed to determine the person’s blood-alcohol content is admissible and may be used to argue the defendant’s consciousness of guilt”
“Clearly, there can be no - 17 - 1-24-2184 plain error if there is no error.”
evidence of a person’s refusal to take a blood-alcohol test is admissible and may be used to argue the defendant’s consciousness of guilt
“Evidence of a person’s refusal to take a test designed to determine the person’s blood- alcohol content is admissible and may be used to argue the defendant’s consciousness of guilt.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMorrow, Freeman, Kilbride

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

58 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.