Skip to main content
· 8/16/2001

People v. Slusher

Citations

  • 43 P.3d 647
  • 2002 Colo. J. C.A.R. 4197
  • 2001 Colo. App. LEXIS 1331
  • 2001 WL 921328

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a superintendent’s failure to comply with section 16-14-102(2)-(3) does not deprive a court of jurisdiction
  • holding that a hearing was unnecessary when the defendant’s postconviction motion was time barred and he “failed to allege facts amounting to justifiable excuse or excusable neglect”
  • counsel's failure to advise defendant of rights under the Uniform Mandatory Disposition of De-tainers Act (UMDDA) did not constitute justifiable excuse

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vogt, Ruland, Rothenberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.