Supreme Court of Colorado· 11/13/1990
People v. Batchelor
Citations
- 800 P.2d 599
- 14 Brief Times Rptr. 1525
- 1990 Colo. LEXIS 757
- 1990 WL 174923
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- language “for the purpose of overt sexual gratification or stimulation of one or more of the persons involved” reduces the possibility that statute criminalizing the depiction of child nudity will be used to prohibit protected speech
- that the defendant concealed the photos of his naked nine-year-old daughter, took the pictures at night, posed the child, and took the pictures secretly showed that he took the pictures for his own sexual gratification
- pictures depicting nude children for legitimate purposes are constitutionally protected
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mullarkey, Erickson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Dempsey v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2005-06-27· cited 1,458×
- Robertson v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado· 1994-05-02· cited 64×
- People v. GrossSupreme Court of Colorado· 1992-04-20· cited 61×
- People v. JanousekSupreme Court of Colorado· 1994-04-04· cited 58×
- State v. MyersNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2009-04-07· cited 54×
- Purcell v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2004-11-18· cited 50×
- Whimbush v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1994-02-14· cited 31×
- Board of Educ. of Jefferson Co. v. WilderSupreme Court of Colorado· 1998-06-29· cited 29×
- Ferguson v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1992-02-03· cited 28×
- People v. GravesSupreme Court of Colorado· 2016-02-29· cited 27×
- People v. BergenColorado Court of Appeals· 1994-04-21· cited 24×
- People v. GagnonColorado Court of Appeals· 2000-01-20· cited 21×
- People v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado· 1993-11-15· cited 19×
- People v. AtencioColorado Court of Appeals· 1994-06-30· cited 18×
- People v. SlusherColorado Court of Appeals· 1992-07-02· cited 16×
- Commonwealth v. SavichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-06-15· cited 16×
- People v. Interest of T.B.Supreme Court of Colorado· 2019-06-17· cited 16×
- Aguilar v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1994-12-19· cited 15×
- People v. GalvadonSupreme Court of Colorado· 2005-01-10· cited 13×
- People v. CampbellColorado Court of Appeals· 2004-02-26· cited 12×
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1973-06-25· cited 4,338×
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court· 1972-06-26· cited 4,166×
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court· 1926-01-04· cited 3,272×
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court· 1982-07-02· cited 2,505×
- Erznoznik v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court· 1975-06-23· cited 1,124×
- Osborne v. OhioSupreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 897×
- Bigelow v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1975-06-16· cited 767×
- People v. BennettSupreme Court of Colorado· 1973-10-29· cited 521×
- People v. NormanSupreme Court of Colorado· 1985-06-10· cited 394×
- Kogan v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1988-05-09· cited 194×
- Massachusetts v. OakesSupreme Court· 1989-06-21· cited 191×
- Thiret v. KautzkySupreme Court of Colorado· 1990-05-29· cited 109×
- Hendershott v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1982-09-27· cited 86×
- Gebhardt v. GebhardtSupreme Court of Colorado· 1979-06-11· cited 76×
- People Ex Rel. Tooley v. Seven Thirty-Five East Colfax, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado· 1985-02-25· cited 67×
- People in Interest of MSHSupreme Court of Colorado· 1983-01-10· cited 50×
- People v. BridgesSupreme Court of Colorado· 1980-12-15· cited 46×
- People v. WeeksSupreme Court of Colorado· 1979-02-26· cited 41×
- City of Englewood v. HammesSupreme Court of Colorado· 1983-10-31· cited 37×
- Marco Lounge, Inc. v. City of Federal HeightsSupreme Court of Colorado· 1981-03-02· cited 35×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.