Skip to main content

People v. Batchelor

Citations

  • 800 P.2d 599
  • 14 Brief Times Rptr. 1525
  • 1990 Colo. LEXIS 757
  • 1990 WL 174923

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • language “for the purpose of overt sexual gratification or stimulation of one or more of the persons involved” reduces the possibility that statute criminalizing the depiction of child nudity will be used to prohibit protected speech
  • that the defendant concealed the photos of his naked nine-year-old daughter, took the pictures at night, posed the child, and took the pictures secretly showed that he took the pictures for his own sexual gratification
  • pictures depicting nude children for legitimate purposes are constitutionally protected

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mullarkey, Erickson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.