California Court of Appeal· 12/12/1990
People v. Singer
Citations
- 226 Cal. App. 3d 23
- 275 Cal. Rptr. 911
- 90 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9062
- 90 Daily Journal DAR 14174
- 1990 Cal. App. LEXIS 1316
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding conflict of interest resulting from defendant’s attorney’s undisclosed sexual relationship with defendant's wife deprived defendant of effective assistance of counsel and entitled him to new trial
- the attorney’s former secretary found, copied, and took to the state bar love letters that the client’s wife sent to the attorney, but received no response
- ample evidence of required showing of \informed speculation\ that counsel's affair with client's wife adversely affected the conduct of murder case in which wife was also a suspect, supported trial judge's granting of a new trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. MontielCalifornia Supreme Court· 1993-08-12· cited 279×
- People v. FayedCalifornia Supreme Court· 2020-04-02· cited 186×
- People v. BattleCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2011-08-09· cited 122×
- San Bernardino County Department of Public Social Services v. Servando M.California Court of Appeal· 1991-07-18· cited 89×
- In Re SoderstenCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2007-01-17· cited 38×
- People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2010-06-30· cited 32×
- People v. CastilloCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1991-08-09· cited 23×
- People v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1993-08-12· cited 17×
- Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. ArtimezWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2000-10-27· cited 16×
- State v. LasaneNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2004-07-13· cited 13×
- Manfredi & Levine v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1998-09-23· cited 13×
- Disciplinary Counsel v. OwenOhio Supreme Court· 2014-10-22· cited 10×
- Gallo v. KernanN.D. California· 1996-06-04· cited 3×
- Hernandez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-10-13· cited 3×
- Manfredi & Levine v. Superior Court of VenturaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1998-09-23· cited 1×
- People v. PerezCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2017-10-25
- People v. PerezCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2017-11-03
- People v. PerezCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2018-04-12
- People v. PerezCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2018-05-09
Cites
43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court· 1980-06-30· cited 6,313×
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 5,389×
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1979-06-05· cited 3,633×
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1987-06-23· cited 2,639×
- Burger v. KempSupreme Court· 1987-09-21· cited 1,706×
- Michigan v. ChesternutSupreme Court· 1988-06-13· cited 1,499×
- People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court· 1985-02-01· cited 704×
- United States v. InadiSupreme Court· 1986-03-10· cited 682×
- People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1987-10-13· cited 613×
- People v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court· 1986-10-23· cited 560×
- Carlos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1983-12-12· cited 473×
- People v. EdelbacherCalifornia Supreme Court· 1989-01-23· cited 318×
- People v. StankewitzCalifornia Supreme Court· 1990-07-05· cited 282×
- People v. BoninCalifornia Supreme Court· 1989-01-09· cited 223×
- People v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1989-01-05· cited 223×
- People v. BigelowCalifornia Supreme Court· 1984-12-27· cited 216×
- People v. MoralesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1989-04-06· cited 212×
- People v. AdcoxCalifornia Supreme Court· 1988-11-17· cited 209×
- People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court· 1981-08-31· cited 208×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.