State v. Hilleshiem

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding admission of statements of one party to a conversation to show context in which admissible statements by another party were made
• evidence of victim’s prior injuries admissible as “circumstantial evidence bearing on defendant’s relationship” with victim
• “The prior injuries were circumstantial evidence bearing on defendant’s relationship with [victim] and the credibility of his version of the occurrence which led to her death.”
• “Statements of one party to a conversation may be admitted without regard to their truth or falsity in order to show the context in which admissible statements by another party were made.”
• relationship between defendant and deceased child material
• discussing rule 2.24(3)(f), formerly numbered as rule 23(3)(f)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).