Maisel v. People

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• jury is entitled “to determine what part of an indi vidual witness’s testimony is to be believed and what portion is not to be believed”
• jury is entitled \to determine what part of an individual witness's testimony is to be believed and what portion is not to be believed\
• market value of an item is the price at which it would have probably been sold in the regular course of business at the time and place it was stolen
• In Jones and Maisel, each of the defendants was convicted of larceny and acquitted of burglary. Larceny, C.R.S. 1963, 40-5-2, is encompassed within the present theft statute, § 18-4-401, C.R.S. (1978 Repl.Vol. 8), under which this defendant was charged.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).