Illinois Supreme Court· 1/23/2009

People v. Patrick

Citations

908 N.E.2d 1
233 Ill. 2d 62
330 Ill. Dec. 149
2009 Ill. LEXIS 173

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the defendant invited the alleged error by tendering the jury instruction he later challenged on appeal
holding that because the defendant had not argued insufficiency of the evidence, there was no double jeopardy impediment to a new trial
holding that because the defendant had not argued insufficiency of the evidence, there was no double jeopardy impediment to a new trial
holding that the defendant invited the alleged error by tendering the jury instruction he later challenged on appeal
holding that a defendant is at least entitled to have the trial judge determine, before the defendant testified if possible, whether any of the convictions would be excluded as a matter of law
holding that a defendant is at least entitled to have the trial judge determine, before the defendant testified if possible, whether any of the convictions would be excluded as a matter of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kilbride, Burke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

85 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. Patrick

50 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.