Appellate Court of Illinois· 6/5/2000

People v. Rodriguez

Citations

730 N.E.2d 1188
313 Ill. App. 3d 877
246 Ill. Dec. 723
2000 Ill. App. LEXIS 446

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

observing that the State could have presented an alternative foundation for the admission of a tape, including a witness’s prior testimony of its accuracy
“[T]he lack of a timely and specific objection deprives the State of the opportunity to correct any deficiency in the foundational proof.”
\[T]he lack of a timely and specific objection deprives the State of the opportunity to correct any deficiency in the foundational proof.\
“a court may proceed directly to the second prong of the Strickland test and need not examine effectiveness in the absence of prejudice”
\a court may proceed directly to the second prong of the Strickland test and need not examine effectiveness in the absence of prejudice\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hutchinson, Galasso

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.