Appellate Court of Illinois· 9/26/1995
People v. Acevedo
Citations
- 656 N.E.2d 118
- 211 Ill. Dec. 926
- 275 Ill. App. 3d 420
- 1995 Ill. App. LEXIS 744
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, when considering legislation, courts must select an interpretation that leads to logical results and avoids that which would be absurd
- holding that, when considering legislation, courts must select an interpretation that leads to logical results and avoids that which would be absurd
- holding that, when considering legislation, courts must select an interpretation that leads to logical results and avoids that which would be absurd
- in considering legislative intent, we presume that legislature did not intend absurdity, inconvenience, or injustice
- “The language of a statute must be viewed as a whole, such that each section of the statute is examined in relation to every other section”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bowman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. Canizalez-CardenaAppellate Court of Illinois· 2012-11-28· cited 67×
- People v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois· 2020-06-17· cited 43×
- People v. MoncriefAppellate Court of Illinois· 1995-12-18· cited 35×
- People v. RodriguezAppellate Court of Illinois· 2000-06-05· cited 33×
- People v. O'CONNORAppellate Court of Illinois· 2000-05-01· cited 25×
- Holland v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois· 1997-06-27· cited 22×
- People v. BarnesAppellate Court of Illinois· 2018-02-02· cited 20×
- Brooks v. City of PeoriaAppellate Court of Illinois· 1999-06-15· cited 15×
- Taylor v. Police Board of the City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois· 2011-11-04· cited 7×
- D.C. v. S.A.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-09-12· cited 5×
- People v. BaltzerAppellate Court of Illinois· 2002-01-22· cited 4×
- Collins v. Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annuity & Benefit FundAppellate Court of Illinois· 2002-06-18· cited 3×
- Dc v. SaAppellate Court of Illinois· 1996-09-12· cited 2×
- Taylor v. POLICE BD. OF CITY OF CHICAGOAppellate Court of Illinois· 2011-11-04· cited 2×
- People v. RodriquezAppellate Court of Illinois· 2000-06-05
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- People v. La PointeIllinois Supreme Court· 1982-01-29· cited 680×
- Illinois Graphics Co. v. NickumIllinois Supreme Court· 1994-08-04· cited 518×
- People v. YoungbeyIllinois Supreme Court· 1980-11-18· cited 201×
- Scadron v. City of Des PlainesIllinois Supreme Court· 1992-11-19· cited 129×
- McDunn v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court· 1993-08-26· cited 94×
- People v. HicksIllinois Supreme Court· 1995-01-26· cited 86×
- People v. HarrisIllinois Supreme Court· 1985-01-23· cited 47×
- People v. LibermanAppellate Court of Illinois· 1992-04-30· cited 30×
- People v. BriddleAppellate Court of Illinois· 1980-06-04· cited 18×
- People v. BeachamAppellate Court of Illinois· 1977-06-29· cited 16×
- People v. HarrisAppellate Court of Illinois· 1968-11-20· cited 12×
- People v. MasonAppellate Court of Illinois· 1978-05-26· cited 11×
- People v. TonerAppellate Court of Illinois· 1977-12-09· cited 9×
- People v. LoweyAppellate Court of Illinois· 1995-04-21· cited 6×
- People v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court· 1995-01-26· cited 5×
- People v. BenitezAppellate Court of Illinois· 1994-12-29· cited 4×
- People v. FosterAppellate Court of Illinois· 1994-05-19· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.