Illinois Supreme Court· 6/3/2005

People v. Phillips

Citations

831 N.E.2d 574
215 Ill. 2d 554
294 Ill. Dec. 624
2005 Ill. LEXIS 945

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

remarking that “[t]he disjunctive language in each count simply gave the State flexibility as to the physical form of the pictures”
finding an argument forfeited due to appellant’s failure to support his assertion with argument or cite relevant authority
finding an argument forfeited due to appellant’s failure to support his assertion with argument or cite relevant authority
issue forfeited where defendant raised it but failed to make any argument or citation to relevant authority
because charging instrument was not defective, trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to challenge it
once corroborated, a defendant’s statement may be considered along with the corroborating evidence to determine whether the defendant committed the offense beyond a reasonable doubt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.