Supreme Court of Colorado· 5/6/1985

People v. Oates

Citations

698 P.2d 811
53 U.S.L.W. 2592
1985 Colo. LEXIS 433

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding, contrary to Supreme Court's analysis in United States v. Karo, 468 U.S. 705, 104 S.Ct. 3296, 82 L.Ed.2d 530 (1984
holding, contrary to Supreme Court’s analysis in United States v. Karo, 468 U.S. 705, 104 S.Ct. 3296, 82 L.Ed.2d 530 (1984
rejecting the reasoning of United States v. Karo, 468 U.S. 705, 104 S.Ct. 3296, 82 L.Ed.2d 530 (1984
rejecting the reasoning of Karo, 468 U.S. 705, and holding that the installation and presence of a tracking device in purchased commercial goods constitutes a search under the Colorado Constitution
rejecting the reasoning of Karo , 468 U.S. 705 , 104 S.Ct. 3296 , and holding that the installation and presence of a tracking device in purchased commercial goods constitutes a search under the Colorado Constitution
government-installed beeper in a 110 Ib. drum of phenyl-acetic acid purchased from a chemical company was a search under Colorado Constitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dubofsky, Erickson, Rovira

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

54 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.